Looking for ""guillermo gonzalez" robert marks"?
Staying true to form evolutionists denied the tenure of a highly qualified science professor at Iowa State University recently. Why? It appears the main motivation is the fact Guillermo Gonzalez accepts the Intelligent Design hypothesis and has written books in support of this view. Gonzalez has impeccable credentials:
" in publishing 350 percent more peer-reviewed publications than his own department's stated standard for research excellence? Or in co-authoring a college astronomy textbook with Cambridge University Press? Or in having his research recognized by Science, Nature, Scientific American and other top science publications?"

In 2004 Gonzalez department nominated him for an "Early Achievement in Research" honor, his supporters noted.

According to Robert J. Marks, distinguished professor of electrical and computer engineering at Baylor, he checked a citation index of journal papers, and found one of Gonzalez' research papers had 153 citations listed; another had 139."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BRAVE NEW SCHOOLS
Intelligent Design torpedoes tenure
Profs say beliefs played role in Iowa State decision

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: May 19, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern



© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com



Guillermo Gonzalez

Two faculty members at Iowa State University have conceded that the beliefs of assistant professor of astronomy and physics Guillermo Gonzalez, co-author of "The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery," played a part in the school's decision to deny him tenure.

A story to be published in World Magazine quotes professor Eli Rosenberg, chairman of the physics and astronomy department at the school, insisting that intelligent design "was not an overriding factor" in the decision but that it "played into" the process.

The article also reported that astronomy professor Curtis Struck said he was unsurprised by the denial because Gonzales "includes some things in his astronomy resume that other people regard as taking a coincidence too far." His reference apparently was to the issue of intelligent design.


As WND reported earlier, a report in the Ames, Iowa, Tribune said Gonzales was one of three members of the ISU faculty denied promotion or tenure of the 66 considered during the past academic year.

"I was surprised to hear that my tenure was denied at any level, but I was disappointed that the president at the end denied me," Gonzalez said.

Gonzalez' acknowledgment of intelligent design had earned him opposition within the school earlier. In 2005, three ISU faculty members drafted a statement and petition against intelligent design in the science curriculum that collected 120 signatures.

Claims for intelligent design, said the ISU faculty statement "are premised on (1) the arbitrary selection of features claimed to be engineered by a designer; (2) unverifiable conclusions about the wishes and desires of that designer; and (3) an abandonment by science of methodological naturalism.

"Whether one believes in a creator or not, views regarding a supernatural creator are, by their very nature, claims of religious faith, and so not within the scope or abilities of science. We, therefore, urge all faculty members to uphold the integrity of our university of 'science and technology,' convey to students and the general public the importance of methodological naturalism in science, and reject efforts to portray intelligent design as science."

Officials with Evolution News, which has reported extensively on the case, earlier said two of the professors linked to the statement were in the astronomy and physics department: Prof. Steven Kawaler, who has linked to the statement on his website, and Univerity Professor Lee Anne Willson, who is married to ISU math professor Stephen J. Wilson, who signed it.

Rosenberg also told World Magazine that the "reputation" of the professor among others in his field is a significant factor. "Of course, if 'reputation' is used as a code word for whether one's views are popular among fellow scientists, then this is another way anti-ID bias entered into the decision," Evolution News said.

Evolution News also debunked Rosenberg's claim that there was something deficient about Gonzalez's research record.

"You take a look at somebody's research record over the six-year probationary period and you get a sense whether this is a strong case. Clearly, this was a case that looked like it might be in trouble," he said.

"Really?" questioned Evolution News in its commentary. "Was Gonzalez somehow derelict in publishing 350 percent more peer-reviewed publications than his own department's stated standard for research excellence? Or in co-authoring a college astronomy textbook with Cambridge University Press? Or in having his research recognized by Science, Nature, Scientific American and other top science publications?"

In 2004 Gonzalez department nominated him for an "Early Achievement in Research" honor, his supporters noted.

According to Robert J. Marks, distinguished professor of electrical and computer engineering at Baylor, he checked a citation index of journal papers, and found one of Gonzalez' research papers had 153 citations listed; another had 139.

"I have sat on oodles of tenure committees at both a large private university and a state research university, chaired the university tenure committee, and have seen more tenure cases than the Pope has Cardinals," he said. "This is a LOT of citations for an assistant professor up for tenure."

He noted Willson's top two papers have been cited 99 and 86 times.

The Discovery Institute, a Seattle group that supports the discussion of intelligent design evidence, has launched an action alert in support of Gonzalez.

"I think if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it likely is a duck," John West, a senior fellow at the institute, said. "There are two issues here: academic freedom and the First Amendment."

Gonzalez has reported he does not teach intelligent design at the school.

He also has declined to comment on why he believes he has now been denied tenure, but John G. West, associate director of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute called it "ideological discrimination."

Gonzalez has filed an appeal with ISU President Greg Geoffroy.

In 2005, WND reported the Smithsonian Museum in Washington, D.C. reneged on an agreement to co-sponsor the premier of Privileged Planet after coming under pressure from The Washington Post and James Randi – "the Amazing Randi" – magician and long-time debunker of psychic and paranormal claims.
posted by:
Dan
online Dan
Indiana
  • Thats Ok Danny!
    We will let you believe that your God created this Planet in 6 days only a mere 3 thousand five hundred years ago......and on the 7th day he "rested".
    Ignorance is BLISS! and there is none more Ignorant than a Christian.
  • It's dissent, not descent and not really. Would you allow someone who asserted the world was flat to teach geography?
    • Unsu...
       
      >>>>>Would you allow someone who asserted the world was flat to teach geography? <<<<<

      Invalid comparison, Grim. The guy's science was first rate--he co-authored a textbook used in universities. He's been published in peer-reviewed journals more than most of the tenured faculty at ISU. There's been an *admission* that his ID work was held against him even though his science work was tenure-quality.

      Keep in mind: the guy was a professor of astronomy and physics, not biology.
  • >>"denied the tenure of a highly qualified science professor at Iowa State University recently. Why? It appears the main motivation is the fact Guillermo Gonzalez accepts the Intelligent Design hypothesis and has written books in support of this view."<<

    There could be no better evidence that this person was in fact not "highly qualified". ID is simply theological speculation and anyone who tries to dress up this theological speculation as science is basically a liar, besides being a fool.

Recent topics in "Crossroads of Religion"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Falwell Dead GRIM 40 Today, 5:55 PM
The Hateful God of the Bible star 131 Today, 5:53 PM
women = 1/2 men Ali 64 Today, 5:39 PM
"Baby Shock: Germans are dying out" offlineDan 29 Today, 5:02 PM